Petra Maria Schnitzer, photo by Terrence McCarthy* Notes *
Graham Vick’s production of Tannhäuser opened at San Francisco Opera yesterday. Designed by Paul Brown, this co-production with Dallas Opera strikes an elusive balance, it is neither cloyingly traditional nor starkly contemporary. The bacchanalia is one of the weaker points, Ron Howell’s choreography here looks to be inspired by Graham and West African dance, but somehow is vulgar, more so than same scene in the recent
Los Angeles Opera offering earlier this year. However, the rest of the choreography is solid and works well with the lighting, designed by Adam Silverman. The entrance of the men’s chorus in Act I was particularly beautiful with the light streaming in through the windows one side and the singers emerging from the glow. The pacing of the staging was excellent, there was enough action but it was not superfluous.

Runnicles conducted well, the orchestra was together and the tempi were brisk. I was quite worried that Peter Seiffert (Tannhäuser) and his vibrato would annoy me all evening, but he sounded better in this space. Perhaps the Dorothy Chandler is less forgiving, but Seiffert sounded warmer than I remembered, though he did wobble a great deal. Petra Lang was not the most alluring Venus, her shrill voice and her unflattering bed sheet costume were both less than ideal. I had liked hearing James Rutherford at Opera in the Park, but as Wolfram I found his voice lacks heft. On the other hand, Ji Young Yang sounded just as bright as the Shepherd as she had in Golden Gate Park. Her control is imperfect, at times she shrieked a bit. Petra Maria Schnitzer was good, she seemed better matched in this production than in Los Angeles, her voice did not stand out quite as much.

* Tattling *
The San Francisco audience for Wagner tends to be rather quiet, though I did hear, albeit very faintly, a watch alarm. I commend the audience for not applauding for the horse with the hunting party. Such restraint! In standing room man inserted himself next to my companion and the person to her left, he interrupted our conversation to mention the "X-rated" production in Los Angeles. He repeatedly rubbed his arm during the performance and muttered a few times, but this was pretty minor as I could not discern what he was saying. He probably found a seat after Act I, for we did not see him after the first intermission.

Posted in , , ,

3 responses to “Tannhäuser Opening at SF Opera”

  1. Niki Avatar
    Niki

    You are much more discerning than I! While none of the voices amazed me, none offended me either. I thought Wolfram was my least favorite voice and there was almost, but not quite, too much vibrato to Tannhauser. The women I liked much more and would not say that Venus was shrill at all. And I rather liked the brightness of the Shepherd’s voice, although I am glad she had a small part.
    I do agree with you about the vulgarity of the opening dancing. I would have preferred that it be more blatantly sexual and less stupidly dance-y. I also think it went on a little too long. For me, the opening was the weakest part of the whole production.
    But we should be so lucky if all opera could be as consistent as this one was.

    Like

  2. Maury D'annato Avatar

    Sweet fancy moses how I do not understand watch alarms. Every single time I’m at the Met I hear someone’s digital watch beep twice on the hour and I think: who still even wears a *#&% digital watch? And why on earth would you want it to beep on the hour?

    Like

  3. Charlise Tiee Avatar

    I have often wondered the very same thing! Once, I asked someone if he could silence his watch, but he denied that it made sounds. I suspect that the highness of the beeping is beyond the range that can be heard by certain persons.

    Like

Leave a comment