Roh What follows is a piece about Manon at Covent Garden from Miss LCU, the second of three segments from her European holiday.

* Tattling *
I saw Manon at Covent Garden on July 7th and it is now September. Clearly, I am delinquent with my reporting duties. It does not seem to make sense at this point for me to write an actual review. I will, however, use this performance as a jumping off point for an editorial piece.

Can anyone tell me how old Manon is supposed to be in this opera? Anyone? Well, she is very young – fifteen, perhaps sixteen-years-old. So who got cast to portray Manon in the ROH production opposite the Italian tenor heartthrob Vittorio Grigolo? That would be a sultry and rather rotund Anna Netrebko with her rich, dark voice. So what is wrong with this picture? One word: verisimilitude (or the lack thereof).

For some, a few pretty voices are enough to qualify an operatic experience as good or even great. But for me, opera is a Gesamtkunstwerk – a holistic, all-embracing artistic experience that is greater than the sum of its parts. If one component of the equation is lacking, everything else comes crumbling down. Which brings me to why I (and many others) go to the opera in the first place, I go to the opera because I want to completely immerse myself in an alternate reality. For those few hours I am in the theater I want to escape from my life and my world and walk in the shoes of Violetta, Tatyana, or Wotan. I want to be able to relate to the characters – to sympathize with them and to share their joy, heartache, jealousy, suffering, and agitation as if those feelings were my own. When it all comes together – when the verisimilitude is intact – it is magical. You lose yourself and get sucked right into the production. But it is a rare and fragile cohesion, like a house of cards. If one piece is amiss, the spell is broken, and you find yourself in just another uncomfortable seat before a stage full of costumed clowns shrieking their heads off.

My point is how the heck could I possibly relate to Manon as a young teenager when she looks, acts, and sounds like a 40-year-old woman? It is much easier to condone the silly blunders of a naive, hedonistic 15-year-old coquette who is bound for the convent, but hungry to experience all the pleasures life has yet to offer. Chalk it up to her tender age, lack of experience, and insatiable appetite for curiosity. However, a woman in her late 30s who makes those identical mistakes will not inspire the same level of compassion from the audience. Those mistakes will not be viewed as unfortunate errors of judgment by a reckless neophyte, but considered character flaws of a wicked, manipulative, and seasoned gold-digger.

A poor casting decision could easily result in two completely different takeaways from the same story. Instead of compassion and pity for the female protagonist, the audience will feel that Manon got what she deserved at the end – which completely ruins the tragic effect of the opera. What makes a tragedy tragic is getting the audience to fall in love or at least identify with the protagonist (Manon in this case), despite her hamartia (or rather accepting her harmartia as a part her humanness), and then have her die. It is very formulaic, derived from Greek tragedies, and Manon's youthful charm and naivete plays a huge part in this formula as it allows her to ingratiate herself with the audience. Netrebko failed miserably in conveying these attributes. I did not buy her act and that deficiency alone ruined the verisimilitude of the opera for me. Instead of a spirited young woman, I saw someone who resembled a Russian hooker on stage. I do not have anything against Netrebko (though I did find her bragging about her distressed jeans being $1,200 during a 60 Minutes interview extremely gauche and distasteful). She is simply wrong for the part of Manon. If you want to see what a really good Manon looks like, check out the DVD with Renee Fleming in the Opéra national de Paris production. Now Fleming is no spring chicken either, but she was able to portray Manon beautifully.

Posted in , ,

9 responses to “Manon at ROH”

  1. Barbara Avatar
    Barbara

    Renee is obsessive about keeping her weight down while Anna is not. Sigh. I think I would still prefer to see Anna.

    Like

  2. Not a fan of LCU Avatar
    Not a fan of LCU

    And this unfortunately, is the current state of the opera audience – It’s called SUSPENSION OF DISBELIEF people…heard of it?
    this isn’t a teen movie, the vocal experience needed to handle such a part is the kind that can only come with YEARS of singing.
    How sad – most people would love to hear Ms. Netrebko sing this role –
    and for evryone else criticizing her weight may I remind you that SHE JUST HAD A BABY !

    Like

  3. Ms Alice Zhang Avatar

    Hi Barbara,
    Thanks for your comment! Renee has indeed lost a lot of weight. But I say, good for her! She looks fantastic. When she did the Manon with Paris Opera, however, she was rather cherubic back then. Still, Renee is a lyric soprano and her voice type is right for the role of Manon. Plus she’s a great actress. The weight is not so much an issue as the quality of the voice.
    LCU

    Like

  4. Ms Alice Zhang Avatar

    Not a fan of mine eh? Well guess what? I’m not a fan of yours either. First of all, you obviously didn’t pay attention while you were reading my piece. Either that or you just completely missed the point. My guess is if you took the SATs, you would probably fail the reading comprehension portion of the exam. Opera falls under the visual performing arts category meaning it’s not just about the orchestra and voice. What we see on stage is equally important, which is why we shell out the big bucks to go attend live performances at the opera house. Otherwise we can all just stay at home and listen to old recordings of Callas and Battistini. My problem isn’t with Netrebko’s weight or her voice per se. Her voice is fine. It’s rich, dark, velvety, and lovely when she sings the correct repertoire that’s appropriate for her voice type. But Manon does not fit the bill. The role calls for a much lighter, sweeter sound. Unfortunately opera today is marketed to and consumed by a much ignorant audience who are overly generous with their applause and thinks that anyone with – what was it that you wrote? – “YEARS of singing” could tackle any role. And, I hate to break it to you, but looks do matter in this business especially for someone who used her beauty and sex appeal to gain much of her fame and popularity with the masses. It’s pretty safe to say Netrebko’s looks launched her career. As for suspension of disbelief. Are you kidding me? You could perhaps make that argument for A Midsummer Night’s Dream or Die Zauberflöte, but not here. Do you even know what you’re talking about? -LCU, aka Angry Little Asian Girl

    Like

  5. sfmike Avatar

    The Angry Little Asian Girl must have real problems with “Salome” and “Madama Butterfly,” since both parts require a very adult set of pipes for a characters who are supposed to be about 15 years old. If you prefer Renee over the Russian Hooker, fine, but versimilitude in this context is absurd.
    Speaking of absurd, I once saw the great Leontyne Price, who I worshiped, singing in Puccini’s “Manon Lescaut” late in her career and I had to keep leaving my standing room spot for the lobby because I was laughing so hard. Ms. Price was very large and very grand and very ridiculous in that particular role.

    Like

  6. The Opera Tattler Avatar

    Opera by its very nature is rather absurd, I suppose. It is wonderful when a given production can come together and sweep one away.
    I do think Netrebko’s looks aren’t really the problem in this case, her voice is just very dark, and probably doesn’t suit the role of Manon.

    Like

  7. The Opera Tattler Avatar

    Personally, I think there are certainly times when music, singing, and staging can transcend all the silliness. (Or sometimes just acting, as in the case of our latest Salome in SF! Scary!)
    What an endearing standing room story!

    Like

  8. Not a fan of LCU Avatar
    Not a fan of LCU

    Poor angry Asian girl. I understood everything you said. Yes I did take the SATS and my scores were high enough to ensure me an ivy league education. My one question is. “why does anyone care what you think ?”
    This is the second inane “review” you have written. God forbid there be a third. I fear the pullitzer shall continue to elude you.

    Like

  9. Ms Alice Zhang Avatar

    Well, you obviously care enough to not only read my silly rubbish but also comment on it. Congrats on your Ivy league education – it’s incontrovertible proof that you’re very bright and better than the rest of us. Now perhaps you should go out and get a life and stop wasting your time obsessing over my non-Pulitzer worthy ramblings?

    Like

Leave a comment