Met-boris This season, the Metropolitan Opera is presenting two operas that weave personal emotional drama into the sweep of great historical events: Boris Godunov and Don Carlo. On October 8, the final dress rehearsal of Boris took place, and what follows are the Unbiased Opinionator's impressions.

* Notes * 
After Peter Stein's cancellation due to visa difficulties, it was left to Stephen Wadsworth, in only five weeks, to rework the show's staging and direction. Perhaps as a result of this abrupt change in leadership, René Pape's Boris seemed lost, staggering about the stage, looking more drunk than physically and emotionally tormented by the burdens of power and guilt. His vocal delivery seemed to lack core, which might be attributed to the early hour of the rehearsal. Nonetheless, his sound was diffuse and as the rehearsal progressed, tended toward a barked delivery, even in the more legato monologues. I am a great admirer of René Pape's work, however, he seemed miscast here – the effective center of his range is higher than the role demands. But, then, where are the true bassi of yore, those cast in the mold of Ghiarov, George London or Jerome Hines, let alone Chaliapin?

That said, the remaining, very large, solo cast was uniformly strong. Particularly fine were Ekaterina Semenchuk (Marina) and Aleskadrs Antonenko (Grigoriy). The performance by the young Jonathan A. Makepeace as Boris' son Fyodor was nothing short of astonishing: vocally, dramatically and choreographically. This role is often taken by a mezzo-soprano, and such a level of accomplishment by an adolescent was immensely impressive. I cannot imagine a better Pimen (bass Mikhail Petrenko), whose solemn portrayal of the hermit was very moving. Evgeny Nikitin's Rangoni could perhaps be faulted for a certain ragged vocal delivery, but this was in keeping with the smarminess of the character, alternately coming on sexually to Marina and trying convince her to seduce Grigoriy into returning to Moscow to claim the throne, paving the way for the destruction of Russian Orthodoxy by Rome.

The large chorus in Boris Godunov is a character in itself, and a very important one. Driven and oppressed, veering from servile obedience to outraged vengeance, the Met chorus was dramatically magnificent and technically unimpeachable, with razor sharp attacks, violent and dramatically overwhelming outbursts — never yelled, or (as in previous years) fraught with poor blend and heavy vibrato in the soprano section. Donald Palumbo's work with this group has created one of the world's finest opera choruses.

As in Wagner, the orchestra is also itself a character in the opera; never a mere accompaniment, but rather a commentator on and instigator of the events taking place on stage. The incomparable Met orchestra rose to the occasion, which is particularly impressive in light of the fact that the weakest link in this performance was conductor Valery Gergiev, whose head remained buried in the score as he threw out the occasional cue with his left hand, while the right hand flaccidly and indistinctly waved about in unintelligible beat patterns. It is a tribute to the soloists, the choral ensemble and the orchestra that the performance was as cohesive as it was, with only occasional lack of coordination between the pit and the stage. Further, the tempi chosen by Gergiev, in particular in the prologue and in the Third Act Polonaise, were unconscionably rushed. The small string figures that spin over the characteristic rhythm of the Polonaise were reduced to a thin wash as the players struggled to keep up. One can only surmise, generously, that tempo choices were dictated by time constraints.

The set design was spare – even abstract, with the Novodievichy Monastery in the first act reduced to a small entry portal on stage left. The Kremlin consisted of a gold wall which descended from the flies, with a small curtained door for Boris' entrances and exits. While this created a wonderful acoustic resonator for the singers, the row of bells at the top of the set, remaining motionless as digitally produced bell sounds pealed, was frankly a bit silly. The Polish court scene consisted of rows of black columns, which provided a fine backdrop for the elaborate white gowns and hats worn by the noblewomen (designed by Dorothee Urmacher). The triumphant return of Grigory the Pretender's forces in Varmy forest, en route to Moscow, was set on a bare, raked staged, with a central rectangular opening, out of which emerged banner-waiving soldiers and two white horses, which reinforced the old maxim – live animals and children are scene-stealers. At the conclusion, the Holy Fool (in a very fine delivery by tenor Andrey Popov), bemoans the dark destiny of Mother Russia; godless, populated by a mob and rabble ready to follow any leader strong enough to bludgeon his way to power.

* Tattling * 
Peter Gelb's latest innovation, offering 1,000 dress rehearsal tickets by lottery, in addition to those offered to patrons and guild members, combined with a thoughtful and intelligent spoken introduction, and his humorous admonition that the only electrical devices that should operate during the performance be on stage and not in the auditorium, provided for a mercifully quiet, disciplined and cellphone-free audience. If only this were the case in performances and not just dress rehearsals!

Posted in , , , , ,

7 responses to “Boris Godunov at the Met”

  1. Martin Avatar
    Martin

    I found this production totally dispiriting. The hideous spare sets evoked neither Russia nor European Poland. The orchestra sounded murky and dim, and the performances were mostly of the Slavic throw your arms around and stomp variety. In the Polish scene it was hard to tell who was Marina, who Dimitry – though Dimitry had more hair and a more voluptuous figure. Nothing could redeem this visually ugly, dramatically inert, musically stolid production.
    I just saw the Des McAnuff FAUST at ENO, headed to the Met next year. Another cheap looking, minimalist disaster.

    Like

  2. The Opera Tattler Avatar

    Sorry to hear it, I wonder how the public will react to the simulcast.

    Like

  3. EBrown Avatar

    I saw the simulcast today. I thought it was thrilling. I was stunned by the emotionality of this Boris. The acting was nothing less than superb. Each singer seemed to inhabit his/her character. The chorus members each seemed to be an individual, which must be extremely difficult given the size of the ensemble. The singing was sublime. René Pape is wonderful. I did not hear the “bark” that Opinionator mentions, and I found his acting moving. I would love to hear him as Wotan. Ekaterina Semenchuk was as beautiful as she was conniving. The rest of the cast, almost all Russians, was uniformly exciting.
    The production, while not particularly memorable, worked well and kept the focus on the singing where it belongs.
    I wish I could have seen it in person.

    Like

  4. The Opera Tattler Avatar

    Glad to hear it. Perhaps I will catch this when it turns up on public television.

    Like

  5. SA Avatar
    SA

    We saw the simulcast Oct 23 — our site had a technical glitch at Boris’ penultimate breakdown moment! Lost sound for about 3 minutes. Infuriating.Thought the overall experience was enthralling. Agree that the sparseness of the sets was disappointing. The close-up experience of the simulcast, however, more than made up for that as we could witness fully the range of emotions (acting as well as singing was wonderful). The Holy Fool was a standout. BTW, Would love for the Met to use real interviewers for the segments with the performers. Questions were lame, some performers were called up on camera and never spoken to or given a chance to speak. Appreciate the HD simulcasts very much as it’s difficult for us to get to The City.

    Like

  6. EBrown Avatar

    Renée Fleming did the best job of interviewing. She seemed at ease with the interviewers and with herself.

    Like

  7. Natasha Avatar
    Natasha

    I have just seen the encore of the Oct.23 performance, and was very disappointed with the production. To my mind the staging has nothing to do with what Mussorgsky intended for the opera. The chorus, which is the main character of this opera was the most disappointing. Neither their sound nor acting reflected the emotions these people experience through the opera. This was mostly heard and seen in the prologue and the Red Square scenes, and they got much better in the Kromy scene.
    The orchestra sounded beautifully, but the tempi in the prologue and the Red Square scene were way too slow, which copletely ruined them.
    The costumes were, let’s say… very conditional, not to say ridiculous sometimes (especially the soldiers in these red outfits and Pimen, who looked and acted like a Buddist monk)
    Vocal performance for the Russian cast was mostly OK, although I’d say Dmitri was rather cold in the duet scene.
    And I do agree, Rene Pape failed to portrait Russian Tsar, although he might be quite convincing as an ordinary mad man.

    Like

Leave a comment