DomingoCake * Notes *
Sunday’s matinée of San Francisco Opera’s Cyrano de Bergerac opened a run of seven performances. Petrika Ionesco’s production, from Théâtre du Châtelet, is attractive, but does not make for the most elegant set changes. There was much delightful spectacle, and the staging was not entirely old-fashioned either, despite looking fairly traditional.

The orchestra sounded lushly chaotic under Patrick Fournillier, it was unclear if this was because of Alfano’s music or because of the playing. In fact, I had a fairly difficult time getting a grasp on the music, it seemed all over the place. Some of it sounded like Debussy, and some rather more like Puccini.

The chorus did a respectable job, and the singing overall was wonderful. Even in their small roles, Martin Rojas-Dietrich (Montfleury) and Bojan Knežević (Lignière) shone. As did the three Adler Fellows participating in this opera, Austin Kness, Maya Lahyani, and Leah Crocetto. All sang more than one role. Kness was most striking as Vicomte de Valvert, sounding strong and warm. Lahyani’s acting was impressive, she was convincing the Duenna and Sister Marta. Crocetto was an alluring Lisa, the wayward wife of pastry chef Ragueneau. As Ragueneau, Brian Mulligan was wonderful as ever, his rich voice has such a lovely bloom to it. Lester Lynch (Carbon) sang well and with power.

Thiago Arancam seemed the embodiment of Christian de Neuveville, singing with forcefulness. Likewise Ainhoa Arteta was absolutely gorgeous as Roxane. Arteta pierced through the orchestra without the least bit of effort and could float notes beautifully. She had moments of harshness, but these were few and far between. In the title role, Plácido Domingo was ill, and General Director David Gockley made an announcement begging our indulgence in the second half of Act II. Domingo was somewhat gravelly, some of his lower notes were less than perfect, and he did cough a few times. However, his timbre is so pleasing and still had such an ease, our indulgence was hardly necessary. Domingo sang the last aria superbly, communicating the text with such a directness, rendering the supertitles superfluous.

* Tattling * 
On Sunday morning I awoke before dawn as I was so excited for this performance. I dragged Opernphrenologe out of bed and we made our way to the opera house 1 hour before anyone else arrived. Perhaps because of the rain, even by 10 am the standing room line was not much greater than usual. The opera was kind enough to provide us with both coffee and donuts, and by the time we were allowed in a great crowd had developed.

The throng of Domingo aficionados was intimidating. There was some light talking but not a great deal of electronic noise. I did hear a staff member’s walkie talkie in orchestra standing room during Act II. At the end of the opera, someone went through his two plastic grocery bags, and someone gave him a talking to as she seemed irritated by all the noise.

Posted in , , , ,

23 responses to “SF Opera’s Cyrano de Bergerac”

  1. EBrown Avatar

    I loved it. Perhaps, Alfano’s music cannot be classified as ‘great’, nevertheless this production gave the audience a fantastic experience combining spectacle, acting, and enchanting singing. Placido Domingo was truly moving as Cyrano. If this is how the Maestro sings when “indisposed” his voice, even as he approaches 70, must be an eternal instrument. The final scene was heart wrenchingly lovely. Arteta was simply wonderful. The rest of the cast was excellent, as was the chorous I thought the production was quite beautiful. I’m lucky to be seeing it again.
    The couple next to me felt the need to explain things to each other from time to time. I guess supertitles, notes in the program, and their eyes are not enough.

    Like

  2. The Opera Tattler Avatar

    I was much more impressed than I expected to be and am glad I’m hearing Cyrano again.

    Like

  3. Sarah Avatar
    Sarah

    I enjoyed the DVD I saw (Domingo, Radvanovsky), but the music is indeed only sporadically memorable, but still pretty enjoyable. The sets here seem even better.

    Like

  4. The Opera Tattler Avatar

    It can take me a long time to figure out the music to a piece that is new to me, so I’m just going to hear this a few more times. Since the singing is all very lovely, it should be easy enough!

    Like

  5. CruzSF Avatar
    CruzSF

    I saw/heard this for the first time last night, and I loved it, too. I thought everyone sang well, and was amazed at Domingo’s vocal health. (I wonder why so many much-younger singers are blowing out their voices after 10 or so years of singing.)
    I agree that Brian Mulligan was very good, and I’m pleased to have been able to watch his development over the last few productions. I’ll be a little sorry to see him “graduate” to lead roles because his acting is as good as his singing, and often secondary characters don’t get the level of attention that he brings.
    Re: Alfano’s music, I didn’t mind that it wasn’t as immediately tuneful or that it sometimes evoked other composers. Puccini’s own “Fanciulla” and “Butterfly” bear the influences of other composers (Debussy and Ravel come to my mind), and I still think that his children’s chorus in “Boheme” wears unapologetic markings of Bizet. I thought Alfano’s music fit the action well, and I appreciated the lack of cruelty in his vocal lines and orchestration.
    I’m so glad that I bought tickets to 2 performances and can’t wait to see/hear it again in 2 weeks.

    Like

  6. Matthew Felix Sun Avatar

    Italian composer Franco Alfano’s Cyrano de Bergerac made its San Francisco Opera premiere this season, featuring the legendary tenor Plácido Domingo, who made his local debut in 1969. I saw the performance on 30 October.
    It was very gratifying to hear and observe that Maestro Domingo was in full command of his still beautiful and powerful voice and possessed noble stage presence at the age of 69. He also had wonderful colleagues, most memorable was the soprano Ainhoa Arteta who had a vibrant, beautiful and full voice and a lovely woman and a natural actress.
    However, the opera itself was not satisfying. Before the show, I tried very much to like the opera, for the unjustly ignored Franco Alfano’s sake. He was mostly known as the person who finished much more famous Giacomo Puccini’s Turandot, and often criticized for the alleged bombastic efficient ending. What was so unfair here was that his completed ending was seldom performed and his truncated version was undeniably unsubtle. However, once one got chance to familiarize with his complete version of the ending, the criticism hardly stands.
    In this frame of mind, I approached this novelty, which was premiered in 1936 in Rome and was only premiered in the US in 2005, again, sung by Domingo as the title role.
    The story of beauty and beast, the inner and outer beauty issue is a fascinating one. Before music started, we were treated with some backstage business while singers and actors prepared for a show, behind the curtain. Very promising start. However, as soon as the opera proper started, the whole show became quite tedious.
    The four-act opera was set to the libretto by Henri Caïn, based on Edmond Rostand’s drama Cyrano de Bergerac. The libretto was a paring down of the dense play. Apparently, the librettist tried to maintain many strands of the popular play, which unfortunately I had neither seen on stage nor read so my inevitable comparison to the play might be somewhat askant but I will do my best to be as objective as possible.
    The opera tried to present Cyrano de Bergerac as a poet, a swashbuckler and a lover. However, due to natural constraint of the opera, we didn’t get a clear idea of any of these multiple-facet of the character. Without a reflection of his self-denied passionate love, due to his strange look, like Tristan or Radames in Aida, it was hard to sympathize with his pain and value his noble suffering, and the wonderful duality of his characters were seriously under-developed.
    The libretto was very wordy, despite many sword fights it managed to contain and most of these words were set as serious expositions which became aimless and boring fast and thick. According to SF Opera’s program, the play was very suitable to musical comedy. Judging from the whatever remained, I longed for a comedy/farce in the style of Rossini, Donizetti or Offenbach. Alfano, instead, gave it a serious treatment and the shifting between farce and serious passion was not nibble and the hybrid result was very unsatisfying. Those long expositions should be cut much further and whatever remained should be in a Sprechgesang, masterfully employed by Alban Berg or Arnold Schoenberg. When the librettist was not busying feeding us background information, he quoted supposedly Cyrano’s writing, which again got noble but all-purpose full lyrical treatment and soon became meaningless again.
    There were two passages I can quote as what went wrong. When Roxanne went through enemy line to be with her husband, who was about to be killed, she was allowed precious moment to give a detailed description how she passed the enemy line by flashing her loveliest smiles, by claiming to meet her lover, not her husband since that will sure to bring in her own destruction, etc, etc. Another offensive moment was at the end of the opera, just before the dying Cyrano to see Roxanne for the last time, we had to hear her sang lines like these: “My scissors … in my bag.” What was the point of that line? I had no idea. It seemed that the editor’s scissors were hidden in a bag as well.
    Adapting established play or novel is a perilous job. By nature, it takes much longer time to sing than say the words so an opera based on a play will inevitably lose many fine points. A good play needs to have strong characterizations and dramatic integrity and can cover a vast ground in a short span. A good opera needs to have strong characterizations, a clear and easy to follow plot, and is best at expressing outpouring emotions. When I sat through many meaningless (or meaningful in the complete play but less so in the libretto) stretches, I longed for a heightened dramatic situation and bursts of emotions, like those by Verdi, Wagner and Strauss.
    We did get two such moments. One was the famous balcony scene when Cyrano fed words to tongue-tied Christian to woo Roxanne and finally Cyrano pour out his love to Roxanne in concentrated stretch of bearing one’s soul. It started with Puccinian lyricism and ended with Straussian eroticism. The other moment was the dying Cyrano reading the farewell letter he composed for Christian and again, revealed his long suffering and true emotion. These moments brought the character and the music to sublimity but it was only two long scene and the rest of the evening was not very memorable, music wise.
    Sometimes, an equally un-hummable opera could work wonders, like Doktor Faust by Ferruccio Busoni, or The Minotaur by Harrison Birtwistle, as long as they present gripping drama and the music fits the moments on stage.
    I could images two ways of setting Cyrano successfully: a) set it as almost play with incidental music and contain as many fine points as possible, as action packed as the original play, therefore, create a milieu of France of 17th century; b) radically cut the plot to the concentrate on the emotions of one, two or even three main characters, particularly their inner thoughts and struggle, instead of a plot hard to follow and too many characters hard to pin down.
    Alfano’s attempt was noble but the failure was apparent. There was no denying of that.
    Last night’s performance was a not a failure, largely due to the wonderful singing, wonderful visual effects and clever staging, however busy or silly at times.
    It was a triumph of talent of the casts and the will of one of our most beloved living artist.
    It was reported that when San Francisco Opera’s general director David Gockley and Domingo discussed projects for San Francisco, Domingo proposed Cyrano and Handel’s Tamerlano. I couldn’t understand Gockley’s choice on Cyrano but I hope that we still will have chance to hear Mr. Domingo in Tamerlano, which is a true masterpiece.
    The reaction to the performers were very enthusiastic and after 16 years hiatus in a staged role, we welcomed Maestro Domingo’s return with true gratitude. I included two video samples here – one is San Francisco Opera’s trailer for Cyrano and the other one how Domingo save an opening night in 1983. He is a true legend.
    Matthew Felix Sun

    Like

  7. Hank Avatar

    I’ll be seeing Cyrano tonight (November 2). I’m trying to go with an open mind, regarding both the music and PD’s age, so I’m not reading any of the above comments until I come back this evening.
    More then.
    Hank

    Like

  8. Hank Avatar

    Saw the Cyrano last night, Nov. 2.
    The music was effective but non-memorable. Sort of like Strauss without the melody. I couldn’t figure out if the composer was incapable of writing memorable melody or if he was doing it deliberately, since melody was not in fashion in European art music in the 1930s.
    Anyway I thought it worked fine as a theater piece, just as Wozzek does.
    Domingo sang very well indeed last night. If I had not known who he was, and you had told me the part was being sung by a 35 year old tenor in his prime, I might well have believed you. He also acted extremely well.
    The other cast members were all first rate, especially the other tenor, whose voice really almost did sound like a younger version of Placido’s.
    Glad I saw it, but I’d be unlikely to revisit it with just an ordinary cast. I don’t think it really constitutes great-with-a-capital-g music.
    (more to come)

    Like

  9. Hank Avatar

    Tattling…
    Audience was noisy and unruly. I guess that’s because so many were Europeans(!).
    Standees were also Europeans, a lot of them, or from far flung parts of the US. Apparently it was impossible to purchase individual tickets for this production, so even the well-healed from NY and Rome had to stand.
    At the very end, four or five guys who were dressed like stage hands came into the back of the orchestra and watch Cyrano give up the ghost. One of them had a cell phone with him which went off at an especially sensitive moment.
    As soon as the last note sounded, they made a hasty retreat. I have no idea who they were, but it occurred to me that they might have been members of Placido’s personal entourage (I assume he has such). I’m 99% sure they were not SFOpera employees.

    Like

  10. Hank Avatar

    EEEEK! A typo!!!
    Of course I meant ‘well heeled’.
    Although most of them looked pretty health, too…

    Like

  11. mj Avatar
    mj

    Man, this was the most tedious night at the opera I can remember since…. oh yeah, Butterfly last week.
    Sad to say that for me, this has been the most uninteresting SF Opera fall season ever. I enjoyed Werther but everything else has been dull dull dull. Nothing worse than boring opera! Except for screetchy out of tune opera and we’ve had some of that too this season (Butterfly, Aida).
    I do have high hopes for the Makropolous Case. Can’t wait. Also super excited for the Ring cycle.

    Like

  12. Hank Avatar

    Will see Makropolus final dress this coming Sunday, which will be my only chance to see it.
    I’ve seen it in the past. Janacek’s operas are an acquired taste, but they do work theatrically, and he has a real individual voice as a composer, which I think is part of what was missing in the Cyrano music.

    Like

  13. CruzSF Avatar
    CruzSF

    Interesting. This season’s Werther is the only opera I’ve ever considered leaving during intermission.

    Like

  14. Hank Avatar

    Yes, well, I gave up on just about all French opera, except Pelleas & Melesande, years ago. Didn’t even bother to see the Werther.
    h

    Like

  15. The Opera Tattler Avatar

    While I didn’t mind Alfano’s music, I wasn’t compelled either. Then again, maybe I just don’t understand it! But am going once more next week.

    Like

  16. The Opera Tattler Avatar

    Tamerlano is such a wonderful opera, but I doubt very much that we will hear it in San Francisco soon, much less with Domingo. It is too bad, because he was wonderful in it.

    Like

  17. The Opera Tattler Avatar

    I like the music to Wozzeck more than Cyrano, really should think about why that is. Thanks for your comments!

    Like

  18. The Opera Tattler Avatar

    Sorry to hear that! This hasn’t been my favorite season either, but I too have hopes for the remaining productions.

    Like

  19. AKA Avatar
    AKA

    Just saw Cyrano this evening and it completely renewed my faith in SFOpera’s ability to put on a truly engaging “operatic production.” The singing was sublime, the sets and lighting were “grand,” and the staging was engaging. The music was forgettable, but the performances were so it didn’t matter. This is the level of production I had expected before the season began, but until now was only partially delivered with “Nozze” and fell miserably short with “Butterfly” and “Aida.” For us, “Werther” was a throw away!

    Like

  20. Roberto Avatar
    Roberto

    I went to see this one yesterday. It is not an accident that this opera was forgotten all this time. There is no consistency, musically speaking. My impression is that Alfano had all these sketches and glued them together to create this opera. It doesn’t work dramatically.
    I went to see Domingo, but I saw Ainhoa Arteta. She is the one who should have sang Butterfly. She has that kind of light voice for Butterfly. I really liked her a lot and I wish she comes back.
    The Brazilian tenor that sang Christine, Thiago Arancam, is promising.
    First time that I saw Domingo. Now I can say that I saw him. 🙂

    Like

  21. The Opera Tattler Avatar

    After 3 times of hearing this, I still could not make heads or tails of this music.
    Arteta is fantastic.

    Like

Leave a comment