37A8979* Notes * 
“Enjoy your hundredth Carmen!” teased my husband as I left for the opening of the latest production of this opera at San Francisco Opera last night. Quite an exaggeration, at best I’ve seen this opera twenty-five times, though I have seen this staging by Francesca Zambello way back in 2007 at Royal Opera, Covent Garden in London.

As it turns out, the performance was enjoyable. The playing was lovely, there was lots of good singing, and the production is attractive and sleek. I very much remembered the warm orange-reds of the stage and the orange tree in the middle of the stage in Act I. The set is efficient, there’s no dead time in-between acts, and the performance clocks in under three hours since is only one intermission and cuts to the dialogue.

I always like Zambello’s humanistic details, as with Captain Zuniga’s struggle to get free when he is bound at the end of Act II and the possible observers to Carmen’s tragic end up at the top of the arena. It was clear she was able to engage the audience.

Maestro James Gaffigan conducted a sprightly orchestra. The overture had a fine transparency. There were brief unfocused moments, as when the children’s chorus entered or in the smugglers quintet in Act II. However, the many soli throughout the piece were all very nice, particularly the clarinet solo at the beginning of the last act.

The cast is youthful and attractive. The Adlers all were great, I especially liked mezzo Ashley Dixon and soprano Natalie Image as Mercédès and Frasquita, they are well matched and charming.

Bridges is remarkably consistent, her voice had only the slightest few catches at first. Otherwise she gave a strong, vital performance. Though her dancing lacks verve, she moves with a lank grace, and her Carmen is robust. Her Don José, tenor Matthew Polenzani, has a depth of emotional range that is palpable in his voice. In his last aria, he moves from imploring to cajoling to demanding, every phrase with a different color with an immediacy that doesn’t require knowledge of French to understand.

* Tattling * 
This is a great first opera, and I hope the production brings out lots of new people, as it seems to have so far. The only problem with this is there were quite a lot of whispering and phone screens out during the music at yesterday’s opening, so you won’t see me at Carmen again this summer.

Posted in , , ,

One response to “SF Opera’s Carmen”

  1. Lee McKusick Avatar
    Lee McKusick

    Thanks for the review. I was far away from the stage in Balcony 3. I was watching this Carmen particularly for the embedded ballet. I am puzzled why ballet tells stories so well.
    I came into the opera with a puzzle. Why can a short dance embedded in an opera communicate so much about the story? The biggest dance, which I will call a ballet ,I am pretty sure, was the Habanero music with Carmen J’Nai Bridges dancing on a table and looming over Don Jose.
    But then again, there was that Habanera song with some acrobatics in Act I, and then the Dancing with her friends in Act II. Interesting, like you say, the dancing was done with a lank grace.
    As I think back over the performance, there were more dances and acrobatics that I didn’t notice at first. I was looking for one classic embedded ballet and I didn’t notice there are several embedded small dances and acrobatic displays and several choreographed motions of the whole cast, each adding to the story.
    I saw the 2016 Carmen and I wound up reading about Gypsy Law and Romani traditions. These articles help explain how Carmen conducted herself and what she did.

    Like

Leave a comment